Automate Your Way to Better Project Management

Project managers are increasingly using software and third-party app integrations to streamline tasks, reduce simple errors, and eliminate the type of busywork that can distract from more crucial responsibilities—the ones that require a human touch. The top project management software companies have already worked many automation tools into their suites of products, empowering practitioners and their teams with an almost seamless adoption of the latest features. For project managers with a growing number of automation tools at their disposal, the challenge becomes not only knowing when and how to use these capabilities—but also knowing when not to.

Your Augmented Future Today

Virtually all of the top project management tools boast some form of automation that claims to help teams scale their efforts, increase predictability, enhance communication, and eliminate mindless administrative tasks.

These native solutions are not driven by artificial intelligence or machine learning, although companies are incorporating those into their platforms in other ways. The automation tools discussed here are built using rules-based conditional templates with potential situations and resolutions limited to the programs’ functionality. While similar to the most basic, non-GUI-based versions of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) systems, they are limited to automating only the functionality of the software, not replicating or manipulating information. (To do that takes extramural development and scripting to accomplish.) So while RPA can be used to transfer data from one system to another and then execute a function—as when it automates invoice creation in an accounts receivable system—project management software automation is used to streamline parts of a system, by doing things like updating the status of a task when a subtask is resolved or assigning an issue to a particular team member at a particular point in the process.

For example, LiquidPlanner uses a scheduling engine that calculates task completion based on project priority, effort required, and resources allocated. After the team starts work, the software adjusts deadlines according to any changes in workload or project scope.

Similarly, Wrike has a built-in automation engine that notifies users of upcoming due dates and moves completed tasks to subsequent stages. The company also provides an extensive catalog of customizable templates, which “allow users of any level to create automation rules,” says Kuleen Mehta, Lead Product Manager of AI/ML for Wrike. “No coding experience required.”

The most ubiquitous of the project management platforms, Atlassian’s Jira, offers an extensive library of dozens of prebuilt rules that can be used as templates for new projects. For those users who want to start from scratch, there is a simple, no-code form that allows users to customize their own rules.

We spoke to several project managers who weighed in on their experience using Jira. In discussing new directions for the future of automation in project management, they told us about what tasks they automate most and what responsibilities they feel should be left to human beings.

A Closer Look: Jira Automation

The COVID-19 pandemic amplified the need for easy-to-use remote collaboration tools and presented new opportunities for project management software companies to increase product adoption. Atlassian had already been working to shed Jira of its reputation as a complex, nonintuitive tool with a learning curve too steep for the average user, and automation has become a big part of that effort.

In October 2019, Atlassian acquired Code Barrel and then integrated that company’s popular Automation for Jira into its cloud service in March 2020. The 2021 release of Jira Work Management is an attempt to reshape Jira, a tool best known for software development and IT service management, into a one-stop shop for other teams and departments as well, such as marketing, human resources, finance, and design.

The building blocks of automation in Jira are quite simple. Automation rules are composed of triggers, conditions, and actions. Pick a trigger: This is the event that sets the rule in motion (the “when”). Choose a condition: This is a requirement that must be met in order for the rule to continue running (the “if”). Pick an action: This is what carries out the rule by performing a specific task (the “then”).

Triggers, conditions, and actions enable users to create simple automation rules for important but tedious practices. One such Jira automation use case is closing out a parent task when all of its subtasks have been completed. Performed manually, this process—trolling Jira for every outstanding ticket, checking the status of every task and subtask, following up with each individual involved, and then marking off and closing the parent issue—can be a big time drain.

Instead, users can select the automated rule from Atlassian’s library and instruct Jira to send an email when it’s been fulfilled. As long as team members mark off subtasks as they finish them, parent items will complete and close themselves.

An automated rule like this could make the workflow more efficient for project managers and the process more transparent for developers. If issues update and close on their own so long as subtasks are marked off, then team members have more motivation to keep up with the status of their work.

“One of the biggest pain points that I have on daily standups is developers not updating the status of their tasks,” says Patricio Tillard, a Cordoba, Argentina-based Toptal project manager. “Now, as long as they keep moving things at a more granular level, I know that the parent card is up to date as well.”

For Belgrade, Serbia-based Toptal project manager Nina Djokovic’s team, however, this rule proved inefficient. In many cases, she says, “the sum of all subtasks wasn’t a complete task. There was always something else to be worked on,” causing her to have to reopen closed tasks in order to follow up on them before closing them again manually.

These contrary experiences from the field reveal an important lesson: Every team and every project manager needs to understand their product and workflow completely before implementing automation rules. If not, features intended to save time and aggravation could end up doing the opposite.

Where Automation Is Most Useful

The best automation solutions are those that keep tasks moving and communication “really seamless, transparent, and up-to-date,” Tillard says. “You don’t need to change the entire process to be automated, but when you can take out things that are small and tedious, you get a different type of productivity for your team.”

Colorado Springs, Colorado-based Toptal project manager Michael Reda agrees. Like Tillard, he prefers to use automation to streamline processes associated with reporting on finished work, specifically for developers. “I want the developer focused on developing software,” he says. “I don’t want them to have to finish a story and then report that they finished the story.”

Tillard automates reminders for his developers to make things easier: “We have a checklist that automatically asks you, ‘Have you published


Fuente: PMideas (Automate Your Way to Better Project Management).